Author:
Fonet
Jeremic told the press in The Hague that the ICJ chose to declare its opinion in a technical manner and in this way avoided speaking out about the fundamental issue of whether Kosovo Albanians actually had the right to try and secede from Serbia.
The Minister reiterated that Serbia will never recognise the unilaterally declared independence of Kosovo-Metohija, adding that the ICJ’s opinion will soon be forwarded to the UN General Assembly, which will give a political conclusion on the issue.
The next step in the process is a debate at the UN General Assembly in New York this September, Jeremic affirmed voicing his belief that it will then be seen whether Serbia has been leading a proper policy.
Today in the courtroom it was not said whether anyone had the right to secede. Such a debate is political and it will apparently be led in the UN General Assembly, the Minister concluded.
Difficult days and great hardship lie ahead, but it will not be the first time for us, the Minister underlined, warning that it is crucial to preserve peace and stability in the province and that Serbian citizens do not respond to provocation, if there should be any.
It is of utmost importance for us to maintain composure, persistence and determination and to remain united during a continuation of our peaceful political struggle, he proclaimed.
Jeremic stressed that he does not anticipate changes in the stance of key players in the international arena now that the ICJ’s opinion has been heard, recalling that every country has a sovereign right to decide how they will proceed in this matter.
ICJ President Hisashi Owada announced the court’s advisory opinion today on the legality of Kosovo-Metohija’s unilaterally declared independence and disclosed that the declaration with which the Kosovo Parliament announced independence is not in contravention of international law because international law contains no prohibition on declarations of independence.
Ten ICJ judges voted in favour of this decision, while four were against it.