Kojen told the Tanjug news agency that a lot of diplomatic effort and political good will would be necessary to come up with a new resolution that would be acceptable for Serbia, Kosovo Albanians and all other members of the Security Council, as well as for many other countries that see a very dangerous precedent in Kosovo's possible independence for solving political conflicts in other parts of the world.
Opinions on the province's future status are very divided, especially among permanent UN Security Council members, Kojen said and explained that on one side there are the United States, Great Britain and France, that fully support Ahtisaari's proposal for independence and think that further negotiations are pointless.
On the other side there are Russia and China that oppose to any imposed solution, believe that possibilities of negotiations have not been used up and on several occasions supported Serbia's sovereignty and territorial integrity at the UN Security Council.
Kojen explained that other UN Security Council members are somewhere in between, with some being closer to the opinion of the Western forces, such as Belgium, Qatar and Panama, while others, such as Indonesia, South Africa and Congo are rather skeptical towards Ahtisaari's plan.
These countries will wait to see what the outcome of the first debates at the UN Security Council will be, especially between Russia and the US, before reaching their final decisions.
He said that together with other coordinator of the state team Slobodan Samardzic, he pointed out at the talks held last week in New York that Serbia is not only ready for the continuation of talks, but for any other form of constructive participation in the process of determining the province's future status.
Kojen also said that those ethnic Albanians who support violence in the province also support stopping further negotiations on Kosovo-Metohija status. He also noted that new violence would cause problems to UNMIK and KFOR whose duty is to secure public peace and order and guarantee safety to all citizens of Kosovo.
Some countries, especially in Africa, Asia and Latin America, regard Kosovo’s possible independence with great concern, Kojen said.
He said that some big powers claim today that Kosovo should be given independence even at the price of violating sovereignty and territorial integrity of one internationally recognised, democratic and peaceable state.
Smaller countries have reasons to be concerned as Kosovo’s independence would be imposed on Serbia by force, which would exclude political means in conflict situations, Kojen said.