Q:
A:
-
Belgrade, 7 June 2010EULEX must stop all violence in Kosovo-Metohija
-
Belgrade, 27 May 2010
Serbia’s cooperation with EULEX brought into question
-
Kosovska Mitrovica, 26 May 2010
EULEX has no mandate to prevent Serbian officials’ visits to province
-
Kosovska Mitrovica, 24 May 2010Giffoni confirms EU's neutral stance on Kosovo status
-
Belgrade, 20 May 2010Aim of attack on Serbs in Zac to force returnees back into exile
-
Belgrade/New York, 17 May 2010
ICJ’s opinion chance for compromise between Serbs, Albanians
-
-
Belgrade/New York, 4 May 2010
Negotiations on Kosovo-Metohija issue possible only in line with Resolution 1244
-
Belgrade, 30 April 2010Telephone signal in largest part of Kosovo-Metohija re-established
-
Belgrade, 28 April 2010
UNMIK requested to establish authority in telecommunications sector in Kosovo-Metohija
-
Belgrade, 27 April 2010
Matic urges reconstruction of dismantled mobile phone towers in province
-
Belgrade, 24 April 2010Disruption of telephone lines in Kosovo must be solved as soon as possible
-
Belgrade, 21 April 2010
Stoning of Serb returnee camp in Zac harshly condemned
-
Kosovska Mitrovica, 14 April 2010
New job incentives for Kosovo-Metohija
-
Belgrade/Manila, 18 March 2010Support of Non-Aligned Movement for solution to Kosovo necessary
-
Belgrade, 17 March 2010
Aim of March 2004 pogrom in Kosovo-Metohija further persecution of Serb population
-
Belgrade, 17 March 2010
Return of Kosovo Serbs linked to feeling of security
-
Belgrade/Manila, 17 March 2010
Serbia receives firm support from NAM countries on Kosovo-Metohija issue
-
Belgrade, 16 March 2010
Portugal will not cut its KFOR forces without talking with Serbia
-
Belgrade, 16 March 2010
KFOR called to reconsider decision on withdrawal from Gazimestan