Presenting the Bill on amendments to the said law in Serbian parliament, Petrovic said that this regulation will strengthen the position of the Prosecutor’s Office and allow the court to establish facts in a criminal procedure in a legitimate manner.
He stressed that it is very important that the Serbian War Crimes Prosecutor’s Office and the National Council for Cooperation with the ICTY have legal conditions for conducting investigation against accessories who give refuge to perpetrators of war crimes or those who are suspected of covering their tracks and obstructing the law.
It is of extraordinary and invaluable importance for Serbia to establish whether suspects or those accused of most serious crimes are in fact guilty or not. I am convinced that Serbia has the strength to establish the truth. When it is suspected that a criminal act has been committed, there is no other truth except the truth established in the court, said Minister Petrovic.
According to Petrovic, criminal procedure for the most serious crimes, such as organised crime and war crimes, cannot be conducted without special procedure and rules which step back from regular areas of criminal law.
Petrovic noted that setting-up special judicial organs for this type of crime has been fully justified because the regular judiciary cannot deal with that as well. He also recalled that in 2003, Serbia adopted laws which established the rules of criminal procedure in fighting organised crime and war crimes.
On September 25, the government forwarded amendments to Serbian parliament concerning the Law on organisation and competencies of state organs prosecuting perpetrators of war crimes.
These amendments envisage that at the proposal of the war crimes prosecutor, the court may order surveillance of telephone and other conversations of persons who are suspected of having assisted perpetrators of war crimes after the crime was committed.
These measures, which may last up to six months, will be conducted by the police, the security and intelligence agency and the military intelligence agency, though at the request of the prosecutor the court may twice extend the surveillance period to three months at the most.
Following the justice minister’s speech, parliament members began the discussion of these legal amendments.