Djelic told a press conference that the Serbian Parliament will contemplate these documents at the session scheduled for the last week of September, so that they could be enforced in the first half of October.
We will finally be able to reply to the question of what belongs to who in Serbia, Djelic said, adding that this will fulfil the final and crucial part of Serbia’s reform programme for acquiring EU candidate status.
After ten years of expectation, a historic injustice will be corrected and the volume of restitution will surpass the value of the entire privatisation process, as more than €4 billion in money and property will be returned to private ownership.
These laws will strengthen the rule of law, speed up the inflow of foreign investment and raise Serbia’s entrepreneurial capital.
The major part of the restitution will be in kind, while financial compensation will be carried out in bonds collectable over the next 15 years, Djelic explained.
Citizens above 70 will be able to collect the bonds within five years, he added, noting that the maximum compensation per owner will most likely be €500,000.
Public debate on the Draft law on restitution, which lasted from 29 July to 2 September, improved this document in five key domains.
Djelic specified that public debate helped to expand the possibilities of restitution in kind, terms of compensation through bonds and money, speeding up and decreasing the costs of the restitution and indemnification processes, adding that solutions to a number of specific cases were also proposed.
Speaking about the Bill on public property, Djelic explained that this document, among other things, envisages that public companies will not be able to automatically take over the property they are currently using, but will be given a two-year deadline to register the property they need for their companies to operate normally.
A number of changes to the Bill on public property were proposed during public debate that will enable its more efficient implementation.
This law is the strongest mechanism in public sector restructuring, Djelic stressed, noting that one of the adopted provisions is that public companies can manage non-constructed building land if it is registered as this company’s capital.
Deadlines for registering public property in the autonomous province and local self-government units were extended from one to ten years and a possibility of joint investment at various levels of government was enabled, with the division of revenue reciprocal to the amount of investment, he observed.
A decree was adopted according to which not only natural running waters, but all waters are to be treated as natural treasure, including minerals.